The Philadelphia Phillies are facing an uncomfortable offseason reality: fan confidence appears to be slipping, and several familiar names are feeling the pressure.

According to the Inquirer Digital fan-poll figures provided for this report, overall positive approval of the Phillies has fallen from 75% in 2023 to 63% in 2026. That decline suggests that patience is wearing thin after another season in which Philadelphia failed to turn regular-season expectations into a deep postseason run.

The individual numbers make the picture even more complicated.

Trea Turner’s reported approval has plunged to 34%, while Bryce Harper remains a popular figure at 83%. Kyle Schwarber reportedly holds an impressive 96% approval rating, and Bryson Stott remains highly regarded at 86%.

The contrast raises a difficult question for the Phillies: Are fans losing confidence in individual players, or are they becoming increasingly frustrated with a team that has repeatedly fallen short of its ultimate objective?

The answer may be a combination of both.

PHILLIES APPROVAL FALLS FROM 75% TO 63%

The reported drop in overall approval is the clearest indication that the Phillies have work to do to restore their relationship with the fanbase.

A 63% positive approval figure still suggests that many fans support the team. However, the decline from 75% in 2023 indicates that enthusiasm is not as strong as it once was.

That shift matters because Philadelphia entered this period with a roster built around established stars, significant contracts, and expectations of postseason success.

Supporters can accept a difficult season when they see a clear path forward. It becomes harder to maintain that confidence when the same weaknesses appear repeatedly and the team continues to exit October earlier than expected.

The Phillies’ early postseason elimination has intensified questions about the roster, offensive consistency, and whether the organization needs more substantial changes.

The fan poll does not prove that every supporter has lost faith. Nor does it establish that the roster must be rebuilt. It does, however, provide a useful snapshot of how some fans are evaluating the team’s direction.

For the front office, declining approval should be a reason to examine the underlying concerns rather than dismiss the reaction as ordinary offseason frustration.

TREA TURNER’S REPORTED 34% APPROVAL IS A MAJOR TALKING POINT

Turner’s reported approval rating of 34%, down from 90% in the earlier comparison supplied, is one of the most striking figures in the poll.

The shortstop arrived in Philadelphia with expectations that came with his elite reputation and massive contract. Fans expected speed, offensive production, and dependable defense from a player intended to be a cornerstone of the lineup.

His 2026 season made that relationship more complicated.

Turner finished with a .242 batting average after hitting .304 in 2025, according to reporting from The Philadelphia Inquirer. His OPS also fell to .675, a significant decline from the .798 mark he produced over the previous three seasons combined.

Those numbers help explain why his performance has become a major offseason talking point.

Turner’s struggles were not isolated to one disappointing stretch. The decline affected the team’s ability to generate consistent offense, placing additional pressure on Harper and Schwarber to carry the lineup.

Still, one disappointing season should not automatically erase Turner’s previous accomplishments. His contract, track record, and remaining years of control make his situation more complicated than simply asking whether fans are satisfied.

The Phillies must determine whether the best path forward involves adjustments to his approach, a defensive position change, or a broader effort to improve the lineup around him.

Turner’s reported approval figure reflects frustration. The challenge for the organization is to determine what changes could realistically restore confidence in his performance.

BRYCE HARPER REMAINS ONE OF THE PHILLIES’ MOST TRUSTED STARS

While Turner’s reported number has drawn attention, Harper’s 83% approval figure offers a contrasting picture.

Harper remains one of the central figures in Philadelphia’s identity. His production, competitive reputation, and connection with the fanbase have made him a defining player of this era.

The Inquirer’s current roster analysis noted that Harper played all 162 regular-season games, led the National League in walks, and finished tied for seventh in OPS. Those achievements help explain why he remains a central part of the team’s plans.

His reported approval has slipped from the higher levels he previously enjoyed, but the figure still indicates strong support.

That distinction is important. Fans can remain firmly behind a star while demanding better results from the team around him.

Harper cannot carry every offensive responsibility himself. If Philadelphia wants to make another serious postseason run, it needs more consistent contributions from the supporting lineup.

The front office must also consider how to keep the roster competitive as its established stars get older and the cost of maintaining the core continues to rise.

Harper’s popularity is an asset, but the organization cannot rely on that popularity to compensate for shortcomings elsewhere.

KYLE SCHWARBER’S 96% APPROVAL SHOWS HOW MUCH FANS VALUE PRODUCTION

Schwarber reportedly leads the group in your supplied figures with a remarkable 96% approval rating.

That result is understandable given his importance to Philadelphia’s offense.

Schwarber has become one of the lineup’s most reliable power threats, and his home-run production gives the Phillies a source of offense that is difficult to replace. The Inquirer has described him and Harper as the team’s offensive pillars.

His high approval also highlights a broader point: supporters are not necessarily turning against the entire roster.

Instead, fans appear to be distinguishing between players they believe are delivering value and those whose performances have fallen short of expectations.

That distinction should matter to the front office.

The goal should not be to make sweeping changes simply to demonstrate that something is happening. It should be to identify where the team is receiving sufficient production, where it needs improvement, and which available moves can address those weaknesses.

Schwarber’s reported rating suggests that his place in the team’s offensive plans remains secure in the eyes of supporters.

The bigger question is how Philadelphia can build a more balanced lineup around him.

J.T. REALMUTO AND THE BACKUP CATCHER QUESTION

Realmuto’s reported approval rating of 65% represents a more divided response.

The veteran catcher remains respected for his work behind the plate, but questions about his offensive production and workload have become increasingly relevant.

The Inquirer noted that Realmuto started 122 games behind the plate in 2026, a demanding workload for a catcher aged 35 or older. Its roster analysis also highlighted the contrast between his defensive value and his diminished offensive output.

That creates a difficult roster decision.

Philadelphia values Realmuto’s game-calling and experience, but the organization also needs to consider whether reducing his workload could help preserve his effectiveness over a long season.

The backup catcher position presents another challenge. Rafael Marchán and Garrett Stubbs have not established themselves as obvious long-term solutions to every concern surrounding the position.

A stronger backup could allow Realmuto to receive more rest without forcing the team to sacrifice too much production.

The Phillies do not necessarily need to move on from Realmuto to improve the catching situation. They may instead need a better plan for distributing playing time and strengthening the depth behind him.

GARRETT STUBBS AND RAFAEL MARCHÁN FACE DIFFERENT QUESTIONS

The supplied figures put Stubbs at 45% approval and Marchán at 17%.

Those numbers suggest significant dissatisfaction with the team’s backup-catching options, although the poll figures should be treated as a snapshot of fan opinion rather than a definitive evaluation of either player.

The concern is straightforward: Philadelphia needs reliable depth behind Realmuto.

A backup catcher is not expected to replicate everything a starting All-Star provides. However, the position still needs to deliver competent defense, manage a pitching staff, and contribute enough offensively to avoid becoming a consistent weakness.

Marchán’s reported approval figure is particularly low, indicating that supporters may have limited confidence in him as the answer to the team’s backup-catching problem.

For Stubbs, the question is whether his value as organizational depth justifies keeping him in the picture while the Phillies explore stronger alternatives.

The front office should evaluate the available market before making a final decision. If a more dependable backup is available at a reasonable cost, upgrading the position could improve the roster without requiring a major financial commitment.

ALEC BOHM’S 56% APPROVAL CREATES AN INTERESTING OFFSEASON DEBATE

Bohm’s reported approval rating of 56%, down from 70%, is another figure worth examining.

His situation is complicated by his offensive contributions, defensive questions, and upcoming free agency.

The Inquirer described Bohm as a productive run producer while questioning whether the Phillies would bring him back after previous attempts to trade him. The team’s decision will depend on more than fan approval alone.

Bohm can provide useful contact hitting and drive in runs, but the front office must determine how his production fits into the overall lineup and what kind of contract would make sense.

There is also a financial consideration.

Re-signing Bohm would require the Phillies to commit money to a player whose role and long-term value must be weighed against other roster needs. Letting him leave would create a hole that would need to be addressed through free agency, a trade, or an internal option.

The reported approval figure suggests that supporters are not universally opposed to Bohm returning. It also shows that his standing may be less secure than it was previously.

The Phillies should avoid making the decision based solely on public reaction. They need to compare Bohm’s expected production, salary demands, defensive fit, and available alternatives.

BRANDON MARSH’S REPORTED 26% APPROVAL RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT HIS FUTURE

Marsh’s reported approval rating of 26% represents one of the sharpest negative reactions among the players listed.

His season illustrates how quickly a player’s standing can change when production falls away.

The Inquirer noted that Marsh went from starting the All-Star Game to being left out of the lineup for an elimination playoff game. It also reported that his .482 OPS after July 1 was the lowest among hitters with at least 230 plate appearances during that period.

That decline creates a difficult decision for Philadelphia.

Marsh has previously shown the ability to contribute, but the organization needs to decide whether it can reasonably expect a rebound or whether his roster spot would be better used on another option.

A trade is one possibility, although the Phillies would need to consider what kind of return they could obtain and whether moving him would leave another weakness in the outfield.

The team also has to evaluate whether the problem was a temporary slump, a broader offensive issue, or a combination of factors.

The reported poll result reflects frustration with Marsh’s recent performance. His offseason evaluation should focus on whether there is a credible path back to the level of production the Phillies need.

BRYSON STOTT AND JUSTIN CRAWFORD OFFER REASONS FOR OPTIMISM

The reported figures for Stott and Crawford are much more positive.

Stott’s 86% approval rating suggests that fans continue to value his contribution. Crawford’s reported 89% figure also indicates strong support for the young outfielder.

Stott’s value extends beyond his bat. The Inquirer has highlighted his defense, speed, ability to play multiple infield positions, and baseball awareness as important parts of his game.

Those qualities matter on a roster where the Phillies need both offensive production and defensive reliability.

Crawford presents a different kind of opportunity. As a young player, he represents the possibility of internal improvement rather than another expensive veteran addition.

The organization must determine how much responsibility he can handle and whether he can provide the consistency required for a larger role.

Neither player’s approval rating guarantees future success, but both figures indicate that supporters see reasons to keep them involved in the team’s plans.

For the Phillies, developing useful young players could be especially important as the organization considers how to balance a costly veteran core with the need for greater roster flexibility.

THE NO-TRADE CLAUSES MAKE THE FAN POLL MORE COMPLICATED

One important qualification in the debate is that fan approval does not determine whether a player can be traded.

Several of Philadelphia’s highest-paid players have contractual protections that restrict trades without their consent. PhillyVoice has highlighted the no-trade clauses attached to major contracts held by players including Harper, Turner, and Aaron Nola.

That means even a sharp decline in a player’s approval rating does not automatically create a realistic route to removing him from the roster.

A trade would require a willing player, a suitable destination, and a deal that makes financial and baseball sense for both organizations.

The Phillies also have to consider whether moving an established player would actually improve their chances of competing.

The poll is useful because it shows where fans are frustrated. It is not a transaction plan.

For players with no-trade clauses, the more realistic path may involve adjusting their roles, improving the supporting roster, or helping them return to stronger production.

The front office has to separate what supporters would like to happen from what is contractually and practically possible.

WHAT THE POLL COULD MEAN FOR THE PHILLIES’ OFFSEASON

The reported approval figures point toward several priorities for the offseason.

First, Philadelphia needs to improve the consistency of its offense. The Inquirer and MLB.com have both highlighted concerns about the team’s production beyond its leading hitters, while Turner and Realmuto are among the players whose 2026 offensive numbers require attention.

Second, the team must decide how to handle its free agents. Bohm, Luis Arraez, and other players present different questions about production, role, salary, and roster fit.

Third, the Phillies need to strengthen their depth. The backup catcher situation and the outfield picture illustrate how quickly a roster can become vulnerable when starters struggle or injuries occur.

Finally, the organization must consider how to make better use of its younger players without placing unrealistic expectations on them.

These decisions are connected. Spending heavily to address one weakness could limit the resources available to fix another.

The best offseason will not necessarily be the one with the most dramatic headline. It will be the one that improves the roster in ways that translate into better performance.

PHILLIES FANS ARE DEMANDING RESULTS, NOT JUST FAMILIAR NAMES

The reported decline in overall approval does not mean Philadelphia has stopped supporting its team.

It suggests that some supporters are becoming less satisfied with the direction and results of a roster that has carried substantial expectations.

The differences between the individual ratings are revealing. Schwarber and Harper remain highly regarded, while Turner and Marsh have reportedly experienced significant declines. Stott and Crawford continue to attract strong support, and the catching situation remains a source of concern.

Those differences give the Phillies a starting point for understanding the conversation surrounding the roster.

However, the poll should be treated as one measure of fan sentiment, not as a substitute for scouting, performance analysis, contract evaluation, or long-term planning.

The Phillies need to identify which players can help them contend, which positions require upgrades, and which moves are realistically available.

The organization has important decisions to make, and supporters will judge those decisions by what happens on the field.

Philadelphia’s challenge this offseason is not simply to restore fan approval. It is to build a roster that gives those fans a stronger reason to believe.